PDF
version
June 15th,
2007
One of the archetypes astrology students and buffs are
hearing more about and about is Lilith. I hear people asking each
other what’s going on with Lilith, and the number of the responses
that are warnings not to confuse the three Liliths (asteroid 1181,
the Dark Moon and the Black Moon) is more than frustrating. This seems to me a red
herring, as it more often than not prevents meaningful communication
about the archetype, leaving interested people trying to sort what
would be the difference, if any, between the three Liliths before
even having a clear idea about any one of them.1
Some of the substantive responses offer that
it’s about a person’s erratic side, what’s hidden below the surface,
the part of the person that rages underneath, and very often it’s
said to be about femininity and sexuality. This is useful, but if we
leave it at a few keywords we run the risk of sidestepping some very
useful sides of the Lilith story. Also, some of it looks like
some of the more intriguing stuff written about Pluto, and it’s
important to tease out how they’re different...because they most
certainly are different.
In my counseling practice I use the true Black Moon Lilith
(BML), never the mean BML.
Often the calculated position of the latter is more readily
available, so a lot of people use it. The main reasons cited for
the use of the mean over the true position is that the orbit of the
BML is highly erratic, with the true position varying up to 30
degrees from that of the mean, and its sudden change of direction
and velocity. As Juan Antonio Revilla points out, use of the true BML is the only of the two
options that lends itself to the “irrational, instinctive, and
primal symbolism of Lilith.”
If you study and open to the story of the myth, you’ll see
that using the mean position makes absolutely no
sense.
I differentiate between the story as we understand it today
(it having been shaped by human culture) and what the story is at
the core of it, which involves basic elements independent of any
culture’s telling of the story. With some archetypes this
means we have to go back in time to peel away layers of overwriting,
but since Lilith has been stuffed into dark closets for so long and
therefore tampered with minimally,2
I’m not convinced we need to do so;
essential elements of the story are still recognizable in human
expression of her story.
The essential element of the story is the
suppression of the basic, natural creative drive which is an
integral feature of each of us, leaving us choosing to ignore a
facet of our nature in order to be acceptable to others. Above I quote Revilla using
the word “instinctive”: At your root is an animal nature that
doesn’t question and doesn’t conceive, it simply is. This part of you operates
without regard to anything but its impulses. It’s pre-human; it’s
something that we have in common with and ties us to all of
life.
When we humans, breaking away from all of
our culturally-conditioned control-freak & brainy glory, use
that energy to guide our behavior – when we give in to that
instinctive side of ourselves – we cannot be controlled. What we as individuals need
can be met while steering with this energy, but what we as a society
need is threatened by giving this mode sway. Airing that side of
ourselves in our Saturn-saturated culture is more than likely to get
us into trouble.
Lilith comes in here: The story of Lilith is
about an individual consciously choosing to live according to this
side of herself, in integrity, and what happens as a result because
she lives with others, others trying to maintain a rule of law. She’s making a conscious choice to live by
instinct. The idea of not doing so
doesn’t appeal to her, even though in the myth she’s threatened with
heinous things if she continues on her path. Her refusal to obey the
angels’ command isn’t so much Uranian (anti-Saturnian) as it is
simply following her gut instincts about what’s good for her (pre-
or a-Saturnian). It
isn’t in her nature to deny her
nature.
I find it useful to treat archetypes as processes, in order
to avoid stereotypes.
If we talk about Lilith in less than three dimensions, we’re
settling for keywords and likely risk trafficking in stereotypes,
missing a critical point: Lilith is in each and every one of
us. Using a shorthand
for Lilith based in the abundant red herrings surrounding info about
her story won’t work.
And for that matter, for any of the new bodies and energies
we’re looking at in astrology today, we owe it to ourselves to
crusade against stereotyping.3
As a counseling astrologer, the most
important question in my mind about Lilith is: How do we make
Lilith? Why is she
raging? In other words,
how is a person inspired to bring out that energy? What is it that we do that
can bring out such rage from a person? When does that seem the
right, the best, or the only thing left to do? I can’t help someone with
Lilith issues if I can’t understand and help that person understand
the archetype as a process he or she might be living. It’s not enough for me to
talk about the myth and end with a couple of keywords; people are
walking myths. We
regularly take on the stories of mythological figures, whether
conscious of it or not – again, people are living, breathing,
walking myths – and if you can help someone understand the myth
she’s living (and, if she’s coming to see me about it, probably
confounded by), you can help her understand what are her choices and
why she’s made those she has, and to forgive herself if needed (and
with the Lilith part of ourselves, it’s needed frequently). And if that happens, she
will naturally see how to make different choices if she desires to,
or at least to see where the sticking points that keep her from
doing so are.
As stated above, the archetype is generally
about suppression of the basic, natural creative drive and a
resultant feeling of not honoring a basic element of the self. Through the lens of culture,
of our lives, this is only where the story begins. The ensuing period of
suppression is one of building tension, experienced either actively
as anger, resentment or rage, or stuffed into a quiet corner where
we think (hope) it won’t cause any trouble. But festering
resentment/anger/rage always does. The outward manifestation of
living the Lilith energy, whether the native is aware of it or not,
will cover a vast range of attitudes and behaviors, and can include
attitudes of pessimistic passivity, suspicion, resentment for being
thought to be uncontrollable, cautiousness in admitting power in any
form, whether the existence or importance of one’s own or someone
else’s (as recognizing someone else’s will lead us to see our own),
as well as the oft-mentioned rage, irrational and instinctual/primal
behavior. Since our
culture has created the taboos it has, these attitudes and behaviors
will be centered on/revolve around issues of sexuality and gender,
and how issues surrounding power have informed and shaped
them.
Independent of individual chart
interpretation, this archetype is about a part of us so far removed
from the kind of lives our societies teach us to live that it’s
hidden deep down, and reaching into it can trigger an
explosion. The well of
creative energy each of us possesses is in fact the natural sexual
energy it’s taboo according to society to express freely or embody,
making delving into the places we keep Lilith energy a potentially
difficult undertaking.
I don’t believe that the nature of the archetype is about
being hidden, but that social conditions have led to an overall
necessity of being hidden in the individual. I also don’t believe that
doing Lilith work is about sexuality per se, but reaching into the
part of us which doesn’t differentiate our sexual nature from our
overall nature.
Lilith’s story in particular myths is a container cultures
retain in order to keep the energy out of the mainstream, at
bay. No doubt the
collective understands containing it necessary to its survival. But no matter how hard a
culture works, there will always be each energy in existence flowing
through all people.4
The danger in Lilith energy to the culture is if individuals
get in touch with it inside themselves, as then individuals would
rely more on their instinctual nature, in all likelihood bringing
them to see that certain ways they participate in society don’t do
them any good.
Admission of Lilith in ourselves will in this kind of culture
lead to the urge to drop out (or sabotage it, if the influence of
anger or desire for vengeance outweighs the primacy of the fact of
the individual’s freedom to leave), which society does everything it
can to prevent. The red
herring nature of the three Liliths warning and the promotion of the
mean BML position over that of the true position feel to me to be
subconscious diversions stemming from the collective. The more time I spend
working on this archetype, the more I connect with the threat
individuals owning this part of themselves pose to society, and the
less ready I perceive the society feels itself to be for people to
truly embrace this part of themselves. But here’s something: No
society is ever ready to admit, recognize or confront Lilith. Her aims run counter to a
society’s, and the level to which we’re suppressed (we’ve bought
into the suppression) indicates the level of cultural, social and
religious conditioning we’ve
accepted.
On the individual level, I often see people ready to and
looking in some form to deal with this energy. For these people there is
neither an outlet nor (usually) a support structure available to
them, and procession can be cautious, if at all maintained once
begun. The
manifestations of the beginning of this process I see in clients
often are shame and anger stemming from pain. These are garnered from
personal sexual or creative experiences of varying kinds, the sexual
and creative experiences of family members and friends (whether the
native is conscious of it or not), and the mores and taboos of the
society. In other
words, the negative manifestations of Lilith experiences are due to
pain and result in shame and anger at the surrounding structures
that seem to have caused the pain. Always there is the
experience, had or witnessed, of the individual being treated in a
hurtful way for being what he or she naturally is because it cannot
be controlled, and always at the hand of a group or individuals
acting out the fears and taboos of a group. The pain associated with the
story of Lilith that we’re all carrying is so buried that we act it
out by the oblique, indirect mandate of the group; no one
understands how to take responsibility for their portion of the
energy so the expression is often careless and confused.5
The construction of the myth as a vehicle to
explain the energy, to create a justification for the energy, is
rather transparent. The
Hebrew version has Adam created from dust, while Lilith is created
from sediment (or filth, perceived to be filth). Her perspective is that they
are equals; they are each made from the earth. His position is that they
are not equals, that she is made from inferior material and
therefore inferior.
Wait a minute – just what is sediment? Dirt and other organic
material that’s been mixed with and transported by water, air and
ice – earth that’s been mixed with and transported by other organic
features of our planet.
Regardless of the connotations of sediment to Adam and
Judaism, it can be useful to us today: Sediment is earth plus, that’s seen more
of the world and is settling back to offer something new to where it
lands.
The evidence of an equal being standing in
front of you cannot be reasonably denied, and yet this is what this
myth serves to do (or rather, it tries to escape reason entirely,
refusing to submit to it).
We are in effect told that a being made from the same
material as Adam/man is not equal to him, and that as a mate, only a
being made from him is
acceptable. The reason
that Eve is acceptable is of course because there is no possibility
that she will expect to be treated as an equal. Eve knows her place and that
she owes it to Adam’s existence.
Lilith, as the first woman, is the mother of women, and Eve
is the plastic stepmother introduced as an example to women of what
society will tolerate in the form of a woman.6
The sticky part is that women are not Eve; women are not
created from a portion of men.
Men and women are humans, the same species; each is conceived
and born in the same way from the same genetic material. And it turns out that you
can’t convince people of that kind of garbage for very long. It’s been just a few
thousand years and we’re waking up quickly. We can internalize all the
red herrings, keep ourselves focused on how we should be, but people will
always have access to their own true
natures.
When clients with a sensitivity to Lilith
issues around them come in, I encourage them to begin with
themselves in order to get to know the energy. It’s often easier to see
difficult things in others first. Locating in the self the
willingness to look into this space is the first step, since we
don’t have a lot of positive, culturally sanctioned examples of
people taking this journey, and since this archetype about being
true to the self, each person has to get there on his
own.
Multiple
Liliths
I haven’t been drawn to work with the Dark
Moon, but have been tossing around an idea with the asteroid Lilith
(1181). I offer it here
as a potential starting point to investigate the relationship
between the two: Is the BML our personal connection (associated with
the Moon) to the enormity of the suppression and the related mass
feelings about it and our capacity to express it, while the asteroid
represents a more conscious, and therefore manageable, doorway into
understanding?
I wonder if the expression related to the
asteroid is easier to deal with, by the very nature of the
difference between an asteroid (a body in the sky we can locate) and
the empty focus of the Moon’s orbit (something we can never see and
associated with the dark side of the Moon, also never visible from
Earth). Astrologically,
we understand how to deal with asteroids; some of us work with a
bunch of them and we’re generally primed these days to talk about
them. The dark side of
the Moon, however, has no parallel in our work and
thinking.
In this line of thought, transits,
progressions and solar arcs to the BML would present urges and
opportunities to explode context in significant ways, while those to
the asteroid Lilith would work on a more manageable level and,
perhaps, be more socially or outwardly oriented, or philosophical or
intellectual. I’m
thinking of the asteroid in a way as superficial, but I’m not
implying that it’s not useful or worthy of attention. Only that as the way is
paved for an asteroid, the message it brings might be more likely to
be more digestible.
Notes